Bella Girona Crag with Riki-TA-Vale returned from a Saturday job .. ... devanstante Lola Flavietto r hot hot hot .... Ta .... thanks for the photo.
hello
Monday, March 29, 2010
Monday, March 22, 2010
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
Men's Bathroom What Color Rug Brown Accessories
Bending and bending, the vexed qauestio
When one thinks of the inflections, the collective exercise that comes to mind is what some technically defined by the term "push up" (pushups). Some zealous instructor, however, is quick to point out now that in fact the year in question should be called "pushups" and not bending, but why? Here then is the reason most absurd and disparate. Some will say that this is because the bending movement is in support, others will say that if he declined the body center of gravity is expected to remain firm but acknowledged that these definitions are correct, and explain the significance? A definition makes sense and reason to be in when there is a need in the definitions and methodology described above seems there is none. Moreover, these definitions are not exhaustive, as they give rise to apparent contradictions.
If it were true theory of gravity, the chins of bending should be seen that the center is moving but it seems obvious that this is instead of inflections: the muscles used are in fact the flexors. If the support of the theory were true, one arm stretched above the head with his elbow that bends, bringing his hand to his head (as is done in the year for the extensors of the forearm) should be defined bending whereas it is a bending. Then use as a criterion? I said that the concept must have a methodological justification. This justification is related to the type of muscle contraction used, and whether agonist muscle groups are flexors or extensors.
Let us therefore define a rational guideline.
If the flexor muscles are used, it seems clear that we are facing a decline as long as they are interested in concentric contraction. If, however, to contract in the extensor muscles are concentric contraction, we will be in front of an extension. Up to here everything seems simple enough: to flex the hip flexors, extensors extension.
Now we come to bending: this involves the use extensor muscles, but in eccentric contraction. Instead, when flexor muscles are working in eccentric contraction, we will be faced with what is called relaxation.
We understand that this one-time, bending, bending, extension or relaxation, we define the muscle group and mode of contraction.
As I always state, the language defines the professional then, no more bending and bending in the wrong place. 
When one thinks of the inflections, the collective exercise that comes to mind is what some technically defined by the term "push up" (pushups). Some zealous instructor, however, is quick to point out now that in fact the year in question should be called "pushups" and not bending, but why? Here then is the reason most absurd and disparate. Some will say that this is because the bending movement is in support, others will say that if he declined the body center of gravity is expected to remain firm but acknowledged that these definitions are correct, and explain the significance? A definition makes sense and reason to be in when there is a need in the definitions and methodology described above seems there is none. Moreover, these definitions are not exhaustive, as they give rise to apparent contradictions.
If it were true theory of gravity, the chins of bending should be seen that the center is moving but it seems obvious that this is instead of inflections: the muscles used are in fact the flexors. If the support of the theory were true, one arm stretched above the head with his elbow that bends, bringing his hand to his head (as is done in the year for the extensors of the forearm) should be defined bending whereas it is a bending. Then use as a criterion? I said that the concept must have a methodological justification. This justification is related to the type of muscle contraction used, and whether agonist muscle groups are flexors or extensors.
Let us therefore define a rational guideline.
If the flexor muscles are used, it seems clear that we are facing a decline as long as they are interested in concentric contraction. If, however, to contract in the extensor muscles are concentric contraction, we will be in front of an extension. Up to here everything seems simple enough: to flex the hip flexors, extensors extension.
Now we come to bending: this involves the use extensor muscles, but in eccentric contraction. Instead, when flexor muscles are working in eccentric contraction, we will be faced with what is called relaxation.
We understand that this one-time, bending, bending, extension or relaxation, we define the muscle group and mode of contraction.
As I always state, the language defines the professional then, no more bending and bending in the wrong place.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)